Analysis of the Implementation of a Tinkercad-Assisted Inquiry-Based Learning Model in Electrical Circuit Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.6.2.2026.1779Keywords:
inquiry learning, Tinkercad, Virtual Laboratory, Electrical Circuits, physics educationAbstract
The urgency of this study lies in addressing students’ difficulties in understanding electrical circuits through an inquiry-based learning approach supported by Tinkercad. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of an inquiry learning model assisted by Tinkercad in teaching electrical circuit concepts at the senior high school level. The study employed a descriptive research design involving students and a physics teacher in a senior high school. Data were collected through classroom observations, student worksheets (LKPD), and teacher interviews. The implementation of the inquiry learning model was evaluated based on the achievement of each inquiry learning stage, while student worksheet results were used to assess learning outcomes related to conceptual understanding, process skills, analytical skills, conclusion drawing, and concept integration. The findings showed that all stages of the inquiry learning model were successfully implemented according to the planned procedures. Students demonstrated the highest level of engagement during the data collection stage through electrical circuit simulations using Tinkercad. The average student worksheet achievement reached 85%, categorized as very good. The highest score was obtained in conceptual understanding (91%), while the lowest score was found in conclusion-drawing skills (79%). Teacher interview results revealed positive perceptions of Tinkercad, particularly in its ability to visualize abstract electrical concepts, facilitate student exploration, and provide an alternative to conventional laboratory activities. Despite these positive findings, some students still required guidance in formulating hypotheses and drawing scientific conclusions. This study concludes that the integration of inquiry-based learning and Tinkercad can support the implementation of electrical circuit learning by providing a more interactive, exploratory, and student-centered learning environment. The findings contribute to the growing use of virtual laboratory technology in physics education, particularly in schools with limited laboratory facilities.
References
Adhantoro, M. S., Sudarmillah, E., Gunawan, D., & Prasetyo, A. (2025). Preparing students and teachers for a digital future: A review of the integration of computational thinking in STEM education. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0262050
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
Arifin, Z., Sukarmin, S., Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(8), em2697. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16708
Budiarti, I. S., Logo, N., Gobay, M., Wombi, N., & Pamangin, W. W. (2025). The analysis of Electric Circuit Studio-based virtual laboratory for dynamic electrical material. Impulse: Journal of Research and Innovation in Physics Education. https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2025.52-02
Doyan, A., Susilawati, S., Harjono, A., Annam, S., Ikhsan, M., & Ardianti, N. R. (2025). Mapping research trends on physics learning media based on PJBL model to improve critical thinking skills: A review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(9), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i9.12842
Doyan, A., Susilawati, S., Harjono, A., Annam, S., Ikhsan, M., Ardianti, N. R., & Hakim, S. (2025). Development of modern physics learning media based on interactive web using the PJBL model to improve critical thinking skills: A systematic review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10388
Erdogan, R., Saglam, Z., Cetintav, G., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). Examination of the usability of Tinkercad application in educational robotics teaching by eye tracking technique. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00242-0
Fitria, H., & Purnomo, A. R. (2026). Improving science process skills through the guided inquiry learning model in science learning on homogeneous and heterogeneous mixtures. Jurnal Pelita: Jurnal Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu, 6(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.6.1.2026.1270
Govender, I. (2025). Digital literacy and STEM skills—What is the connection? A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09879-x
Kurmangaliyeva, A., Kafizova, G., & Grant, J. (2025). Using Python to analyse experimental data in high school physics: A study based on external aggregate assessment exams. Journal of Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.71779/310
Manurung, M. L., & Simamora, P. (2025). Development of a guided inquiry-based physics learning module to improve critical thinking skills: A focus on sound wave material among Grade XI students at SMA Negeri 13 Medan. Jurnal Pelita: Jurnal Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu, 5(2), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.5.2.2025.892
Marín-Marín, J. A., García-Tudela, P. A., & Duo-Terrón, P. (2024). Computational thinking and programming with Arduino in education: A systematic review for secondary education. Heliyon, 10(18), e38044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38044
Maspul, K. A. (2024). Enhancing project-based learning in STEM education with integrated technology and coding. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Information Technology, 1(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.61971/jisit.v1i1.20
Riwayani, R., Istiyono, E., Supahar, S., Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., & Soeharto, S. (2025). A systematic literature review of computational thinking study in physics learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(4), 2698–2709. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.29632
Saputri, A. A., Sitompul, S. S., & Habellia, R. C. (2023). The effect of the Learning Cycle 7E model assisted by virtual lab media in improving learning outcomes of dynamic electricity. Jurnal Education and Development, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v12i1.5270
Torres, I., & Inga, E. (2025). Fostering STEM skills through programming and robotics for motivation and cognitive development in secondary education. Information, 16(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020096
Verawati, N. N. S. P., Rokhmat, J., Harjono, A., Makhrus, M., & Sukarso, A. A. (2025). Integrating ethnoscience-PBL and virtual technology to improve critical thinking skills: A literature review and model design. TEM Journal, 14(2), 1878–1894. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM142-84
Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Pang, M. (2024). Virtual experiments in physics education: A systematic literature review. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(2), 633–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2327995
Winarti, W., Sulisworo, D., & Kaliappen, N. (2021). Evaluation of STEM-based physics learning on students’ critical thinking skills: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Review of Physics, 4(2), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v4i2.3814
Zhang, W., Guan, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024). The efficacy of project-based learning in enhancing computational thinking among students: A meta-analysis of 31 experiments and quasi-experiments. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 4979–5008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riskawati Riskawati, M. A. Martawijaya, Nasrul Ihsan, Dirgah Kaso Sanusi, Ihfa Indira Nurnaifah Idris, Sitti Rahma Yunus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
