Pengembangan Model STEAM Berbasis Cognition-Priming dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu

Authors

  • Muhammad Zulham Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo
  • Besse Herdiana Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo
  • Sukmawati Sukmawati Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.2.2.2022.322

Keywords:

STEAM, Cognition-Priming, Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu

Abstract

Pembelajaran STEAM yang sukses bergantung pada interaksi pengaruh, kognisi, dan penerapan ide. Sederhananya, siswa yang tidak mau bertahan dalam upaya berbasis STEAM tidak akan tiba-tiba berkembang menjadi ilmuwan, matematikawan, insinyur, atau ilmuwan komputer, dan mereka juga tidak mencari kursus terkait STEAM atau karier berbasis STEAM. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menyelidiki hasil konten, kognitif, dan afektif terkait dengan kurikulum terintegrasi STEAM dalam arena K-5. Tren saat ini dalam pengukuran pendidikan dan psikometri telah mulai mengatasi keterputusan buatan yang ada antara pengaruh, kognisi, dan hasil konten dalam literatur pendidikan sains. Metode yang digunakan untuk mengembangkan hasil penelitian ini adalah campuran metode kuantitatif untuk mengembangkan model pembelajaran yang terjadi di sekolah STEAM. Dengan menggunakan ANOVA, pemodelan persamaan struktural, dan analisis model, pemahaman terhadap permasalahan yang disajikan menjadi jelas. Analisis statistik model fit menunjukkan model fit yang memadai (x2(21) 30.91, p 0.075, CFI 0.94, TLI 0.93, RMSEA 0.04, SRMR 0.05). Koefisien struktural standar untuk jalur dari kelompok ke masing-masing konstruk signifikan secara statistik (p <0,05) sehingga menunjukkan bahwa kedua kelompok berbeda dalam konstruk efikasi diri, minat sains, visualisasi spasial, dan rotasi mental. Estimasi besaran efek dari perbedaan rata-rata kelompok pada konstruksi yang signifikan secara statistik mengungkapkan efikasi diri (d 1,27, besar), minat sains (d 1,97, besar), visualisasi spasial (d 1,30, besar), dan rotasi mental (d 1,42, besar). Terdapat banyak bukti bahwa pembelajaran inklusi dan terpadu STEAM di tingkat awal sekolah dasar menjadi sangat penting bagi siswa seiring kemajuan mereka di sekolah.

References

Asyatin, A. (2022). Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar IPA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Kuis Team Siswa Kelas 8 SMPN 1 Saradan. Jurnal PELITA, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.2.1.2022.218

Budianto, Y., Syakur, A., & Yunus, N. M. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Biologi Materi Ruang Lingkup Biologi Dengan Model Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom Pada Kelas X SMAN 5 Palopo. Jurnal PELITA, 1(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.1.2.2021.90

Drake, C., Land, T. J., & Tyminski, A. M. (2014). Using educative curriculum materials to support the development of prospective teachers’ knowledge. Educational Researcher, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14528039

Grasela, J. N., Syakur, A., & Syam, S. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning Terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar pada Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup Siswa Kelas X SMAN 10 Luwu Utara . Jurnal PELITA, 1(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.1.2.2021.91

Houseal, A. K., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Destefano, L. (2014). Impact of a student–teacher–scientist partnership on students’ and teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes toward science, and pedagogical practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 84–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21126

Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated engineering learning: Bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x

Lee, S. Y., Song, X. Y., Skevington, S., & Hao, Y. T. (2005). Application of structural equation models to quality of life. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_5

McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20377

Monk, C., Georgieff, M. K., & Osterholm, E. A. (2013). Research review: Maternal prenatal distress and poor nutrition–mutually influencing risk factors affecting infant neurocognitive development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12000

Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2013). A behavior change perspective on self-regulated learning with teachable agents. In: International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 485–500). New York: Springer.

Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. J. (2012). Computational grounded cognition: A new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 612–623. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612

Plass, J. L., Milne, C., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., Hayward, E. O., Jordan, T., & Barrientos, J. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21008

Rahm, J. (2014). Reframing research on informal teaching and learning in science: Comments and commentary at the heart of a new vision for the field. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21141

Revelle, W., Wilt, J., & Rosenthal, A. (2010). Individual differences in cognition: New methods for examining the personality-cognition link. In: Handbook of individual differences in cognition. (pp. 27–49). NY: Springer New York.

Richetin, J., Conner, M., & Perugini, M. (2011). Not doing is not the opposite of doing: Implications for attitudinal models of behavioral prediction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210390522

Rivet, A. E., & Kastens, K. A. (2012). Developing a construct-based assessment to examine students’ analogical reasoning around physical models in Earth Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 713–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21029

Sawtelle, V., Brewe, E., & Kramer, L. H. (2012). Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1096–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21050

Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21010

Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2013). A longitudinal study of environmental and outdoor education: A cultural change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1019–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21111

Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003

Van Eijck, M., & Roth, W. M. (2011). Cultural diversity in science education through novelization: Against the epicization of science and cultural centralization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20422

Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Zulham , M. ., Herdiana , B. ., & Sukmawati, S. (2022). Pengembangan Model STEAM Berbasis Cognition-Priming dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu . Jurnal Pelita: Jurnal Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu, 2(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.2.2.2022.322

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Desember 2022

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

  1. Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
  2. Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
  3. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.